Tell us what features you’d like to see and support other ideas by upvoting them! Share your ideas in a user story format like: As a ˂role˃, I want to ˂function˃, so that ˂benefit˃. This will help us better understand your requirements and increase the chance of others voting for your request.
Hi - It would be a huge time saver to have a filter somewhere (rather than file name) for all documents / drawings / diagrams that have been parsed. Imaging if I have 500+ pages or files to approve, i would only be interested in reviewing those that the system have captured my assets.
To use Canvas for Incident Investigations in our company, we need the cause map to be much more customizable. Currently the cause map defaults to arrows pointing to the left, it would be better if there was no arrow at all instead of pointing one direction or another because we don’t want to have to change direction on every single box. Also, when adding a box below another box, it defaults to a parallel path instead of a box directly under the primary box.
The 3D preview, like what is shown on the asset search preview tab, is unusable with default settings, as the render quality is too low and the point size is too large. We need the ability to set a global default setting for this preview that is usable with our 3D data. Example-
Users would like to see visible annotation / connection lines for equipment drawings (or files) that are linked to assets. The files are linked to assets based on the file meta-data. Currently in Industrial Canvas, it is clear from the asset view that the files are directly linked however in Canvas there are no visible connection lines between the file and the assets. Users will be able to quickly see how their data is connected and drive work package development, RCAs, and other use-cases in Canvas much easier.
Engineers completing calculations on equipment (required thickness, remaining life, etc.) have an interest in building calculations within Canvas. Specifically, when performing RCA or engineering workflows, these calculations validate hypothesis and are currently done in other applications. Having the ability to have default calculations that can be reused would be helpful for non-time series type data. This may come in from an inspection report (we have a pipe this thickness) and we want to validate whether it is acceptable to run. The output should show the calculation, the inputs, and the output.
Hello All,A repetitive feedback we got from clients is that they noticed when a checklist is assigned to a person- they recieve no notification for it - they have to go to “assigned to me” tab & check .They wish there would be an email notification - at activity assignment stage & at expected execution day / a few hours prior- with all checklists assigned to person so they would know to open app & start executing them.
hi,When I want to apply different rules to multiple objects, I don't know of an efficient way to do it, but I first create the rules once on ONE object, then duplicate them and assign them to each object (erasing the unrelated ones). So I am deleting a lot of rules, but the “Do you really want to delete” button is almost hidden and hard to press.I'd be happy to have it checked and fix the position.regards,
This request is coming from National Grid. BackgroundThe current behavior on Industrial Canvas is that only one person can edit at a time. This is very limiting when a team wants to do a collaborative (e.g: over a screen sharing session) troubleshooting, root cause analysis or QC of documents. RequirementAdd capability to support concurrent modifications to industrial canvas so that multiple users can work the same Canvas at the same time. Everyone who has write access to the industrial canvas should be able to edit simultaneously unless the Canvas is explicitly locked for editing by someone.
hi, i like sticky notes parts as it can be easily added, auto-colored, and letter size modified automatically as the notes size changed, i think it’s superior to transparent text objects in most cases.Except, the shape is only square. i want to change them rectangle because we tend to add texts which is several lines long in it.it might be trade-off to auto letter size change, but the changable shape of frame is more useful i guess. i hope some of you will consider and share this.
default: the upper-right among all the attachmentsmy idea: close to where mouse is on
When adding time series data to industrial canvas, providing the name of the tag and the description field in the time series tile window would clarify what tag is being shown. Submitted at the request of the Cognite project team.
When adding time series data to industrial canvas, providing the name of the tag and the description field in the time series preview window would make selecting the correct reading more effective. Currently, there is often not enough info in the time series tag itself to know which data to select. !--scriptorstartfragment--> Submitted at the request of the Cognite project team. !--scriptorendfragment-->
With the recent update, it is now possible to add tables to Canvas. Currently, I believe you can only input text into the tables,but is it possible to embed asset information, timelines, and files into the tables? If this becomes possible, it would allow for a more organized dashboard in Canvas, greatly expanding its usability.
A customer from Oxy reported this.Issue describedIt seems like when searching for a documentation on Maintain it only shows up documents when search through a unique system generated ID rather than the documentation name or drawing no. etcSo basically the user want the search to be searchable through document metadata which they find more meaningful and easier. This behavior is reproducible and seems to align with how search currently functions on Maintain. However, the customer would like the search experience on Maintain to match that of CDF.
A customer from Oxy has highlighted the importance of search functionality when dealing with special characters in Industrial Canvas.Please see the use case below for further clarification:An asset named '4011-1 1/2'-G4J-014' exists in CDF, but when searching with the term '1 1/2'-G4J-014', the asset does not appear in the results. However, using 'G4J-014' as the search term correctly displays the asset as the top result.
A customer from Oxy has reported that the UI in 'Browse 3D' should either open the selected file in a new tab or, upon clicking 'search results' in the top-left corner, navigate directly to the selected 3D preview without losing it, eliminating the need to restart the search.
The customer (BBraun - @gary.goh@bbraun.com) has requested the enablement of the feature that allows Work Orders/Activities from Cognite Maintain to be added to CDF Industrial Canvas. Simply, for any/every annotated Asset on the CDF Canvas the customer would like to bring in the associated Work Order/Activity from Maintain.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users: The users have expressed interests in being able to see both observations and any comments/notes that have been linked to an asset on the asset overview page. This would make the data easily accessible rather than needing to open specific checklists. @Kristoffer Knudsen
A t the moment, CDF Canvas lines for relations ( from P&ID to other document/ assets/ charts/ time series)are only displayed in purple.This is an issue when working on big P&ID, and doing RCAs, all lines are purple & become mixed & hard to track - adding complexity to something that is meant to simplify work.Clients are asking for simplification tools in displaying relation lines , such as:-The ability to change each line’s color/ thickness/ type, or it would be auto-changes for every new relationship added from P&ID-Legend tab where one could select what each color represents from relationship lines & is possible to toggle, if one wishes to hide only some relationship lines related to some assets/ time series.I am not sure if similar idea is published on the hub. but if not, kindly consider it .
Hi. I’d like to see more aggregation functions on the grafana data source. Currently only average, interpolation and step_interpolation are allowed. Any chance to implement support for Sum, Count, etc.? Error: count is not one of the valid aggregates: AVERAGE, INTERPOLATION, STEP_INTERPOLATIONhttps://docs.cognite.com/cdf/dashboards/guides/grafana/timeseries
Problem Statement:Synthetic Time Series in CDF are dynamically calculated based on expressions, but lack persistent identifiers. This limits usability when users need:Persistent IDs for discovery and access. Simplified queries via API, SDK. Centralized definition of expressions as part of the data model, avoiding the need for each backend to redefine them.Suggested Approach:Introduce a Synthetic Time Series Definition object that:Allows defining synthetic series with a persistent external_id. Stores metadata like expressions, descriptions, and units. Enables dynamic evaluation without requiring data storage. Supports defining expressions as part of a model, enabling reuse across different systems without requiring redundant definitions in backends.Benefits:Usability: Persistent identifiers for easier access and queries. Consistency: Eliminates repetitive expression definitions. Scalability: Centralized expression definitions simplify updates and maintenance.
This is closely related to existing suggestion (Cognite Hub) - details specific to our application were already discussed with @Jason Dressel In our data model, we already make use of synthetic expressions and have created a wrapper view for timeseries that can either refer to a regular timeseries instance or a synthetic expression.In adopting CDM, we cannot really represent the same thing using CogniteTimeseries, even if we extend the model, as this would lead to us creating an empty time series for every synthetic timeseries that we want to create. Suggestion is to extend the existing CogniteTimeseries in CDM to have some support for storing and accessing synthetic timeseries expressions.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK