Community Discussions

As we move towards having a data model and location filter we consider as the default for our company we no longer see a use for the system default in most our CDF projects. Is there a way to override the system default so that all new users have one of our custom location filters rather than system default.We are moving away from CDF classic, and we only use the core data model by extension, so the system default causes more confusion at this point than anything else.Rather than “System default”, a “Default” set by ourselves is preferred. Markus PettersenAker BP - Data Platform Architect

Hi, Unfortunately, we experienced unforeseen challenges with the Preview Panel Redesign in the Search application after the Q3 release September 8. Due to these challenges, we opted for rolling back the update, so that we can assess the issues and handle them appropriately. We deeply apologies for the issues experienced with the release, and we will ensure better testing before a new release. Current estimate on timeline for re-releasing the updates with bug fixes and other improvements, is the Q4/December release. Please let us know if you would be interested in a limited Private Preview spot on the updates, which will open up for a period of time before the December release.  Apologies again, and thank you to all reporting challenges with the release, Sofie, Product Manager 

Hi everyone,We're excited to share one of the standout features from our Q3 release: real-time, multi-user collaboration in Industrial Canvas — now in Private Preview.The problem we're solvingUntil now, Industrial Canvas has been a single-user experience. That meant teams working on the same problem couldn't work in the same space at the same time — creating silos and slowing down team-based decision-making.What's newIndustrial Canvas is becoming a truly collaborative workspace, where multiple users can work together simultaneously — exploring data insights side-by-side and driving faster, unified decisions together. Where this creates value — real use cases (not limited to):Root Cause Analysis — multiple engineers investigate different parts of a failure simultaneously and consolidate findings instantly. Field-to-Office Bridge — field operators and back-office engineers mark up the same P&ID together, in real time. Meeting Facilitation — run operational reviews or shift handovers

As part of the September/Q3 product release, we enabled Smarter Search Results across all clusters except westeurope-1.  For westeurope-1, we’re currently working on stability improvements. To avoid introducing additional changes while that work is ongoing, we’ll enable Smarter Search Results there once those improvements are complete.  Smarter Search Results is improving how data is analyzed to provide more relevant and precise search results. See more information about this improvement in the linked documentation. 

Hi everyone,We're excited to share one of the standout features from our Q3 release: real-time, multi-user collaboration in Industrial Canvas — now in Private Preview.The problem we're solvingUntil now, Industrial Canvas has been a single-user experience. That meant teams working on the same problem couldn't work in the same space at the same time — creating silos and slowing down team-based decision-making.What's newIndustrial Canvas is becoming a truly collaborative workspace, where multiple users can work together simultaneously — exploring data insights side-by-side and driving faster, unified decisions together. Where this creates value — real use cases (not limited to):Root Cause Analysis — multiple engineers investigate different parts of a failure simultaneously and consolidate findings instantly. Field-to-Office Bridge — field operators and back-office engineers mark up the same P&ID together, in real time. Meeting Facilitation — run operational reviews or shift handovers

We hit an undocumented behavior of the OPC UA extractor (version 2.38.0, Docker) that we'd like to confirm.Setup: cognite.metadata-targets.clean with assets: true, timeseries: true, relationships: true, plus extraction.update fully enabled. This had been running fine for months — classic asset hierarchy plus classic time series.What we did: we added the GA Core Data Model space option to the same clean block: metadata-targets: clean: assets: true timeseries: true relationships: true space: "<our-instance-space>"What we observed:As documented, time series switched to CogniteExtractorTimeSeries instances in the space, with datapoints available via instanceId. Not documented: classic asset creation stopped entirely, even though clean.assets: true was still set. We verified this by deleting the extractor-managed asset hierarchy and restarting the extractor: after a full startup browse, no assets were recreated — no error, no failure run on the extraction pipeline, nothin

Hi team, we're seeing what looks like a backend issue on westeurope-1 during the Cognite bootcamp.Environment- Cluster: westeurope-1- Projects: cdf-bootcamp-50-prod (also observed in cdf-bootcamp-43-prod)- Time: ~14:40 CEST, 1 Sep 2026Symptom- Transformations and hosted extractors report success / Running, but no instances appear in the data model (Flows/Search is empty).- The datapoints Cognite Function fails when querying the data model:  client.data_modeling.instances.list(...) ->  CogniteAPIError: Request had 1 constraint violations ... [value must not be null] | code: 400 | cluster: westeurope-1 | project: cdf-bootcamp-50-prod  X-Request-ID: 98821131-2f58-9cb9-84bf-b1f9368e4655What we've ruled out- Same code/config works in -test.- Toolkit deploy is green; auth verified; extractors and transformations run without errors.- Instructor indicated westeurope-1 may be having issues.Question- Is there a known incident on westeurope-1 affecting data-model instance writes/reads right no

Who we areWe run a web application for industrial bakery lines that uses CDF as its back end. It's used by both plant operators and management. We're currently migrating our data models to the Core Data Model, and while doing so we've extended it with views of our own — which is what we understood a data model to be for.While migrating we've hit a case where two things we need seem to be mutually exclusive, and we'd like to know the intended pattern.What we needTranslations for some units. Not all of them — a specific set where the label carries meaning for the reader. Our headline case is throughput. We measure, depending on the line and the moment, trays per hour, where a tray may hold several products, or baguettes per hour, or products per hour. #/h is correct dimensionally but doesn't express that variety, and our users need the right word in the right language. (A secondary, milder case: length:kilom has longName: "Kilometer", and there are no accented aliases in the catalogue —

Hi Cognite Community,we currently have a Streamlit Custom App hosted directly in Cognite Data Fusion that we would like to provide to end users for an upcoming testing phase.Our plan is to let the users test the current Streamlit version first, while in parallel we are working on migrating/rebuilding the application as a Flows app.However, this migration will still take some time, while the users are expected to start testing the Streamlit application in approximately two weeks.For the testing phase, we would therefore like to provide users with a direct link to the Streamlit application, but ideally without showing the surrounding CDF navigation/sidebar (Home, Search, Canvas, Charts, Custom Apps, etc.).The goal would be something similar to a standalone/full-screen application experience while still keeping the current Streamlit app hosted and authenticated through CDF.Is there currently any supported way for Streamlit Custom Apps to:hide the CDF shell/sidebar, open the application in

I’m trying to deploy a couple of Streamlit apps into Data Fusion.  I’m getting the error “Error during booting up: Program terminated with exit(1)” in the Data Fusion editor portal.I’d swore one app was working yesterday and I was able to publish, but both apps are giving this error in the editor portal.  I can publish, but I get the same error in Flows when trying to run the custom app. I’ve tried researching and it says to look at the logs, but I don’t see a way to view any log details.Any thoughts on how to debug this? 

To all the experts out there,When parsing a diagram, some annotations may be incorrectly assigned and overlap with the correct ones. For example, "Pump A-1" is correct, while "Pressure Gauge A-1" is incorrect.I want to reject the incorrect "Pressure Gauge A-1" annotation, but I cannot select it because it completely overlaps with the correct "Pump A-1" annotation. As a result, I cannot select and reject the annotation I want to remove. First of all, it is difficult to tell at a glance which annotations are overlapping, as the only indication is a slightly darker color. The annotations I pointed out below are overlapping.I would like it to work like Explorer, as it used to.

I have a workflow that runs subwork flows. In the main workflow, each of the subwork flow tasks is set to ‘skipTask’ on failure. The tooltip notes that the task will be marked as COMPLETED_WITH_ERRORS. However when this happens all I can see for status is ‘Completed’ and no email notification is being set out.What I want is for my workflows to continue to run if a specific portion fails, but I still want the email notification to be sent to notify me that there is an issue.