Suggest features, upvote favorites, and use the user story format: > As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]. Help us build what you need - post your idea now!
Hello,Currently when we search for the information “XXX” the system syncchronize all views records by looking for “XXX” in all the metadata of the views. So this a text link in the metadata.Our end suers would like to limit the number of clicks and synchronize all views including also all the contextualized data.Here below is an illustration of how it could improve the search experience when end users know there tags/assets
If you perform the following actions in InField while status filters (“Ready,” “In Progress,” and “Done”) are set, I believe the status filters will automatically switch.① If you change the “Done” checklist to “In Progress,” only the “In Progress” filter will remain② If you change the “In Progress” checklist to “Done,” only the “Ready” filter will remain③ When you start reviewing a checklist marked as “Ready,” only the “In Progress” filter remainsRegarding point ③, I believe this is by design since it’s a natural flow considering the user’s workflow; however, we’ve received feedback from our users that points ① and ② are somewhat cumbersome to use.① ⇒ In our company, when an approver reviews the checklists Doned by an inspector, they sometimes review them all at once using the following workflow; however, this creates extra effort when instructing a re-inspection.Workflow OverviewConduct inspection (Inspector)⇒ Once the inspection is Done, change the checklist status to “Doned” (Inspector)Repeat this for each checklist.⇒ Review all Doned checklists at once (Approver)⇒ Change the status of checklists requiring re-inspection back to “In Progress” and instruct a re-inspection*Note: When changing the status from “Doned” back to “In Progress,” the filter defaults to “In Progress,” so we must apply the “Doned” filter again to review the next Doned checklist.② ⇒ In our company, inspectors often check multiple checklists simultaneously during a single round. However, when one checklist is Doned and the “Ready” filter is applied, we have to switch the status back to “In Progress” to view the checklists being processed in parallel.If this is an intentional design, it is fine as is; however, if there is no specific reason for this behavior, we would appreciate it if you could implement a specification that retains the filter settings for the scenarios described in ① and ②.I apologize for making such a detailed request, but I would appreciate it if you could consider this.
Requirement: Improve Evaluation Tool CLI Report DetailsThe Cognite Atlas AI Evaluation Tool CLI should include timing information for each individual evaluation question, including:- Start Time — datetime when the test started.- End Time — datetime when the test finished.- Duration (chatDuration) — total execution time, using a consistent unit such as seconds or milliseconds.This information should also be included in the exported evaluation report to support Agent performance and latency analysis, comparison across Agents, models, skills, and evaluation runs, and overall production-readiness assessment.
When you hover your mouse over a chart in Charts, the tag names of the time-series data being plotted and the corresponding values are displayed. While this is a very useful feature, the information is displayed directly on top of the time-series data, which can sometimes obscure the data itself.Although this can be avoided by moving the mouse pointer away from the chart, it does make the experience slightly less user-friendly.Therefore, would it be possible to display the tag names in a way that minimizes overlap with the time-series data? We would appreciate it if you could look into this.
The stamp feature in Canvas is difficult to use from users in Japan. The main reason is that the symbols we commonly use are not available and the shapes are not unfamiliar.This stems from the fact that Japan uses a standard called JIS, which defines the standard symbols used in piping and instrumentation diagrams. (In the U.S., this would be like ASME and ANSI.) “Add JIS-defined symbols” could be a solution, but many other countries also have their own standards.Supporting each of them individually would be impractical.Additionally, different industries outside of oil & gas may require different sets of symbols. Therefore, I would like to suggest adding a feature that allows users to upload their own custom stamps.More specifically, we could upload an image with specified a size to a dataset and use it as a stamp.The reason for specifying a size is that very large images would not be appropriate as stamps. Something around 40×40 px seems reasonable. It would be great if you could consider this.
In Canvas, when a new file revision is loaded the old file is deleted and appears as a red box in Canvas.How do we make the user easily re-load the file into canvas?Is there a trace saved in Canvas that would make it easy for the user to re-attach the new version of the file?(Nova Graeme/David)
Currently the workflows invoke function runs up to the allowed limit and if we try to run other workflows during the same execution they start getting 429 with the error message: {code: 429, message: "The number of running workflows for this project has reached the limit of 50"}We want a mechanism to limit the number of function invocations while setting up the workflow and only for function instances that it would churn up. cc: @Neerajkumar Bhatewara
When you want to upload a file into Industrial Canvas, the UI offers a drop down list of all readable datasets, when it should list only the datasets in which the user can write to. It is very frustrating for a user to select one of the hundreds datasets that they can read from, but when it comes to save it fails, since they do not have write access. The same applies to the Charts Calculated TimeSeries. In the other hand, Jupyter Notebook only shows datasets which the user can write to, so it should be used as a good example
This is the cause of a lot of frustration from our users at the moment. When trying to manually upload a file to Canvas you need to select a data set. However, the list you get is not the data sets that you can actually upload a file to, but simply a list of all datasets you have read access to. This makes it really difficult to identify the data set that you can actually use as there is no indication before you click upload and get an error popping up.In general end users of CDF at us will not have access to upload files manually to most of our data sets in production due to governance. Which is why we’ve set up a dedicated data set for this purpose. So we think a better solution would be if this list showed all the data sets that the user could actually upload to (all data sets the user has write access to) rather than all the data sets that will produce an error.Or at the very least have some kind of an indicator of the access level. Trial and error on the user side here is just a nuisance. We don’t see the point in showing all the data sets that will fail without indicating that they will fail.The intended audience for Canvas are not the developers that know all aspects of our implementation of CDF, but the domain experts that know the data. We want their experience to be as seamless as possible and right now it is not, and to avoid the system even allowing for these kinds of mistakes. Markus PettersenAker BP - Technical Domain Architect for CDF
Add functionality to visualize mathematical formulas rather than the raw LaTeX formatting which Atlas AI currently outputs. If you take a look at the screenshot I think it’s clear that is not a very friendly format to show to our end users Example of preferred output format: Example prompt for replication:Hvordan regner jeg ut volum til 100% fylte endekapsler til en horisontal sylindrisk separator. må anta en endebunnfaktor k, hva betyr denne?Example of how the formulas should be visualized (the visualization of LaTeX, not the raw format)Markus PettersenAker BP - Data Platform Architect
Hello Team,Although i have checked the documentation. I would be interested to understand if there is any discussion to generate charts programattically. this would help us Automate ESP surveillance for wells in one go.the idea is that once a well comes online it would automatically generate a ESP chart.
This feature request is to add the ability for Charts to send notification alerts via mobile texts. Often times, manufacturing leadership would like to be alerted off-hours for major operational issues. Text messages have proven to be an excellent means of alerting key resources outside of normal working hours.
When creating a “Point of Interest” in Scene, after it’s created, you need to click on an area that doesn’t overlap with the point cloud (the dark blue area in the screenshot) to display its details.This means you have to zoom in quite a lot to avoid overlapping with the point cloud, which makes it difficult to check the “Point of Interest” while viewing the entire point cloud.Therefore, it would be helpful if “Point of Interest” could be made easier to click and select, or if Scene could include a mode that allows selecting only “Point of Interest.” This would make the feature much more practical.
When creating calculations in CHARTS it would be VERY useful to have logic functions (AND, OR, NOT, XOR) which allow multiple (>6 for AND and OR) boolean inputs (TRUE/FALSE) and a single output.This would be really useful for tracking events which may be dependent on multiple conditions being active (or not active).
Manual rotation of credentials is often time-consuming and leads to outages when done incorrectly. To make it simpler to automate, could Cognite add API endpoints dedicated to updating credentials?This is especially relevant for Cognite functions, which currently require sometimes lengthy redeployments to update secrets. When I ask GitHub Copilot about which API endpoints Cognite Toolkit invokes to update secrets and credentials used by a Cognite function, implementing this myself on top of the existing API seems very brittle.I think automating the rotation of credentials will be much simpler if it can be decoupled from other deployment processes.
We observed that search behavior differs between Asset Centric and Data Model.Asset Centric search provides more flexible matching and returns results based on relevance, allowing users to find assets using partial text. The Asset Centric View would performs a Fuzzy Search and returns results that are best match to the search text.However, in Data Model View we are required to input the exact text with correct spacing/hyphenation, prefixes etc. to get the results and does not perform fuzzy search.Users transitioning from Classic to Data Model have found difficult to work with the new search mechanism as they do not always key in the correct names or search queries. While we understand the Search mechanism from Classic cannot be implemented on Data Model we wanted to add a topic to see if we can have the Data Model search to more forgiving and user-friendly through partial matching, typo tolerance, relevance-based ranking or similar mechanisms.
Preference to use the term "time series" instead of "trend".
Add location codes as static information in the F.LOC view to inhance user experience.
Ability to create conditional tasks in InField. An example is shown below: If a user answers "Yes" to any of the items in the checklist below, new checklists (Category 1, 2, 3) should be generated.Norwegian: Ønsket er å kunne opprette conditional oppgaver i InField. Et eksempel er vist under. Hvis man svarer "Ja" på noen av punktene i sjekklisten under ønsker man å opprette nye sjekklister (Kategori 1, 2, 3)
As an administrator of CDF in Aker BP I have a need to see all apps we have deployed, not necessarily accessing the apps, but knowing they exists. As a minimum this information should be available through the API. This is the information I’ve found in the Cognite Docs, I can do it per app from the app repo. But that requires that I already know it exists and that’s the heart of the issue, I don’t know all the apps that exists. If someone has deployed and published an app without activating it, then I have no way of knowing about it. Hiding non-activated apps from most users is a useful feature, but hiding it from the admins is a security breach. I am aware that tooling for managing this will come, but that does not remove the need for the information to be available through the API. There is still a need to export the information to data/app catalogues for the sake of governance. Markus PettersenAker BP - Data Platform Architect
As our main data model grows we are seeing a need for better management and navigation in the Fusion UIWe are doing what we can to “trick” the UI into behaving how we want. But we still run into limitations. Grouping the views by the Core Data Model (CDM), doesn’t really serve the purpose we need when the semantics of our views rarely match with the CDM setup. So grouping them by business meaning and relevance is something we see a great value in and would help our end users navigate the UI more easily.We have an “aggregate” model designed for the Fusion UI that contains all our views in one giant model allowing our users to see the full context of what we have in CDF. This model is invaluable to us. This model is also expected to grow with time. Because of this we also see the need to have some kind search/filtering for the views within a location filter as the number of views will force endless scrolling. Markus PettersenAker BP - Data Platform Architect
Ability to sort by multiple attributes simultaneously to improve usability. For example, sorting by area and f.loc. at the same time.Norwekgian: Kunne sortere på flere attributter samtidig for å skape brukervennlighet. F.eks. sortere på område og f.loc. samtidig.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
