Tell us what features you’d like to see and support other ideas by upvoting them! Share your ideas in a user story format like: As a ˂role˃, I want to ˂function˃, so that ˂benefit˃. This will help us better understand your requirements and increase the chance of others voting for your request.
When adding documents in Canvas and saving them as PDF, there is always the same layout, which is not very useful. The user should have the ability to pick and edit the order of the documents and pages to be printed. Additionally, when a.multiple page document is added, only the 1st page of that document is printed.
Mismatch of measurement units, InField only does readings in inches, but some items are in feet. The Operator has to calculate on their phone before entering into InFieldI recommend a combination of ft and inches
I would like the ability to search a Time Series Tag and find documents that are contextualized to the time series in Infield. This is not possible today. I can only do this Asset Centric way.
We need the ability to create check lists by Equipment Type in a generic way. For example, these are the checks for an overspeed trip on a compressor? The current checklists has an asset is assigned on a task level which only make sense If you are doing an operator round and moving from an equipment to another equipment in a round. We need the ability to have a checklist against one asset that has checks for that asset. Examples 1) Functional Test for a Pump 2) Overspeed Trip Test 3) Overhaul of a Compressor etc We would like those generic check lists to be then pulled by technician, completed, tied to the WO and the Asset it was completed for in the WO. It would be nice if some AI looks at the Work order, then tells the technican which checklist to use. Nice to HaveAbility to create checklists that are visual in nature or has infographics that you can put measurements around a bearing picture for example instead a routine scrolling checklists. Ability to have pictures on a task level Ability to have thresholds that are dynamic or calculations of other tags with some logic and not just static numerical values.
Cognite Charts Team, I would like Cognite Charts and CDF help User From Celanese:Here’s my scenario – I’m going to be as vague as an actual problem statement that we would get – At the base of T109 are a set of pumps. I believe they basically pump on-spec AA to the tankfarm. They have been debottlenecked so much over the years that they have essentially run out of NPSH. The scenario is to find the NPSHa of these pumps and figure out how often they cavitate and cause upsets (I’m honestly not sure if they do or not). To do a full analysis on that we’re going to need: The NPSHr of the pumps (pump datasheets aren’t in Bentley, so that’s a problem but I can get it) The historical level in T109 and the ability to translate that level in actual ft of elevation The elevation of T109 relative to the pumps (ie, the isometric on the pumps’ suction or 3D) The temp in T109 The flow from the pumps to the tank farm The ability to correlate drops in flow to the T109 level and temperature Any other time series around this system that may be helpful in the analysis We can then build a calculation showing the NPSHa of those pumps and track it in real time – ideally we would also set an alert when it started to get marginalHow would i get to the last point without speniding hours searching in CDF and then flipping to Charts? Any ideas how i can have all that to build the caclulation in Charts. Access to ISOMETRICS, 3D, Time series and P&ID
From the meeting on 10/22/24.Customers would find Operations in order more useful in Search UX.Can a sort field be added under Operations either by name or by sequence?More than 25 entries will be needed by the customer
From the meeting on 10/22/24Customers need a way to sort in the other areas like equipment. Currently only in assets for sort
Repository:https://github.com/cognitedata/using-cognite-python-sdkDescription:As a developer working with the Cognite Python SDK, I would find it immensely helpful if the repository provided a Dockerfile to set up a virtual environment. This would allow for an environment to be set up consistently and effortlessly with just a few commands ( like "docker build" and "docker run" ) , saving developers from potential dependency issues or misconfigurations.Benefits:Consistent Setup: Eliminates environment discrepancies across different systems, ensuring consistent setup for all users.Time-Saving: Significantly reduces the time developers spend resolving dependency issues.Scalability: Useful for CI/CD pipeline integration in case needed in future.Conclusion:Adding a Dockerfile would make the onboarding process smoother for new users and improve the overall development experience. I'd appreciate if you could consider this feature request!Thank you :)
It is very difficult to search files in Cognite if you dont know the file name. For example, i wanted to search electrical classification drawing for a methanol unit in CDF. it was practically impossible to find it in CDF. Instead, I had to go to the source system → to find the unit methanol and then find the electical classification drawing under electrical drawing folder. There is no way in CDF to search by document classes and/or filter by unit to narrow the search in a few clicks. Also there is no way to isolate fuzzy searches so that i dont get random stuff.
We would like to see the ability to rollup documents by type, using metadata, within the new search UI and Industrial Canvas asset browser, as well as other places where users are looking for documents associated with an asset (similar request to this topic Cognite Hub). We have seen this in the legacy data explorer view and it was well received by our users and our document teams have started to shift their business process to tag documents with the appropriate metadata to enable this functionality.Our assets can have hundreds of different documents associated with them, so an ungrouped list will make it hard for users to quickly find what they are looking for. In addition, we have some use cases where documents are snap-shot and stored as a part of a project file (e.g. P&IDs). Separating these duplicates into the correct rollup buckets will allow us to eliminate confusion on which files are most recent to use. Example for old search:
This is feedback from a unit engineer:When I use the new search experience on Cognite, I noticed the files for a piece of equipment aren’t sorted in to categories unlike the classic data exploration. This is a functionality I really liked in the classic data exploration as it saved time digging through files. Is this a functionality that could be applied to the new search experience?
Filling out on behalf of an engineer super user: When looking through the files of an asset, I only see the P&ID number in the “Tree” view. There should be more information like P&ID title or other details while still in the Tree view so it’s easier to understand what the P&ID contains without having to enter each P&ID/equipment drawing to find out.Scratched the names out in the image below, but say you have a P&ID named “12AB0123” - this doesn’t tell the user very much information.
FDM documentation should have more examples.
Currently, aggregate query options for timestamp and date typed properties are not available in both GraphQL and SDK. Additionally, there is no method to aggregate by a time range, such as monthly or weekly, similar to here available for timeseries.Using groupBy notificationDate (timestamp)Using 'groupBy' with a timestamp/date field, it would be feasible to aggregate data from a data model view by timestamp/date fields, group them by daily granularity, and display the count of a record for each day.Related to this topic.
When using the "scheduled calculation" function in Charts, there is a situation where you can select either "CDF sign-in credentials" or "CDF Client ID and Client secret" as the authority to perform the calculation. Of these, "CDF Client ID and Client secret" is supposed to be selected in order to perform "scheduled calculation" stably, but general users do not know "CDF Client ID and Client secret", so they cannot use it casually.Therefore, I would like to be able to perform "scheduled calculation" stably even if "CDF sign-in credentials" is used. In that case, there is no situation where you want to use "CDF Client ID and Client secret", so you don't need to select this permission in the first place, and I would like you to be able to perform all "scheduled calculation" with "CDF sign-in credentials".
It is becoming clear that Cognite UI/UX is not intuitive for a global scale of sites. How do I not create a laundry list of data sets in the drop down below for each sites? Is there a way to select sites and create a navigation to the right data view of that site and a global view...these challenges remain from a usability perspective.To be honest - CDF just feels like a data dump.
It would be beneficial to implement IP access list restrictions for Cognite projects/accounts. This would enable configuration of IP access lists to ensure that users can only connect through secure, predefined corporate networks.For instance, users could be required to connect via the corporate network or an authorized internal VPN. Remote or traveling users could utilize the VPN to securely access the network. If an attempt is made to connect from an unsecured location, such as a public Wi-Fi in a coffee shop, access would be automatically blocked, enhancing security
Elkem ASA is no longer going to use pure SQL due to a risk SQL poses. They want to use OpenID/OAuth authentication against DB extractor for this reason.As per my knowledge, we currently don’t have the option to use OAuth2/OpenID authentication with DB extractor.
From the meeting 10/22/24It seems that key matching might be more useful instead of semantics. When searching on the tag, a - was needed to get more results
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK