Suggest features, upvote favorites, and use the user story format: > As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]. Help us build what you need - post your idea now!
I’ve provided what should be a very clean visual explanation of the issues that I’m having. I’m trying to add events to my chart that indicate the run status of each pump in a system. I know the equipment tag of the pump I’m looking at and I have done manual CDF searches to find that the tag has events over the time range that I’m looking at. However, the query within charts returns no events. When I query the sister pump’s events, it identifies only 2 of the 3 events in the time frame, useful, but not enough to do what I need to do.
Our hydro reservoirs have water level measurements at different locations. These measurements are linked to the reservoir asset, which can have a geolocation assigned, but we would also like to assign a geolocation to each specific time series. A workaround could of course be to set up a “measurement station” asset for each time series, but I think a geolocation directly on the timeseries would be a more elegant solution.
Hello community members!In the upcoming fall of 2023, we are planning to introduce geolocation and geography data models to our Data Modeling service. One of the potential applications of this feature is the integration of geolocation data with our Timeseries model. This combination will allow the creation of a powerful TimeSeriesWithGeoLocation model, enabling our users to analyze time-dependent data in conjunction with geographical information. We would also like to acknowledge and thank @Kristian Nymoen for inspiring this idea with this post.We'd love to hear from you:How do you envision utilizing geolocation and geography data models in your projects? What specific functionalities or features would you like to see in the TimeSeriesWithGeoLocation model? Are there any challenges or concerns you foresee with the implementation of this feature?@Thomas Sjølshagen @AasmundEldhuset
On the ‘Interactive Engineering Diagrams’ page in the Cognite web UI we can see the list of diagrams pending approval. It would be nice to see the list of approved diagrams too, and to be able to filter for approved vs. pending.I noticed that if both the:Pending interactive engineering diagram Interactive engineering diagram labels are added (through the APIs) to a diagram then it will show up in the list. Refer to the screenshots below.I’m assuming this may be a bug, because a diagram shouldn’t have both labels at the same time. So once a contextualization is approved, it will have only the Interactive engineering diagram label and it should show up in the list.
On behalf of the learning facilitator of the MeOH unit:When archiving and deleting unwanted or completed checklists that have been released from a template, the template feature “historical reports for this template” allows users to re-open checklists that were thought to have been removed. Can this feature be restricted to only Admin users? The concern is that general users could potentially open previously archived/deleted checklists and alter the data that was captured; ultimately affecting the integrity of the data.
On behalf of Celanese Utilities super users:As a user, I would like the option to take multiple readings per line item within a single checklist. We have various readings that we take 3-4 times a day or even twice a shift. Right now my only option is to create multiple checklists to represent the different measurement intervals/shifts. The advanced scheduling option only facilitates a day/night shift or essentially “two” readings per line item per checklist.I would like to see a drop down of sort where I am able to select a measurement frequency per shift/day of the week. This will prevent us from over-crowding the application with duplicated checklists and allow for more streamlined reporting.
When creating templates in InField initially you are allowed to decide if you want the checklist to be deployed at certain intervals automatically or manually every time. These options are only available at the templates initial creation, once made they can not be changed. We should have the ability to change whether or not we want a checklist to be deployed automatically or manually at any given time as the need arises without having to recreate the entire checklist from scratch.
We are making grafana dashboards for our customers to monitor their data. It would be great to be able to make alerts for them so that they can see it in their dashboard. For this we need CDF data sources to be compatible with grafana alert.
Hello! I am using Grafana and Cognite as a source of data. I want to implement map visualizations for some data and use different layers in the map plugin. But the problem is that I cannot set the proper query name and in the data options list, it appears as undefined. I’ve already raised a question in Grafana’s community. But, maybe it’s a problem with the Cognite Data Fusion plugin for Grafana. Here is a link to the topic in the Grafana community. Thank you in advance.
On behalf of Celanese InField users:I would like the ability to utilize the automatic scheduling capabilities while also taking advantage of the advanced scheduling options in InField. This will allow me to schedule my checklists throughout the week and not have to worry about needing to manually locate and open the checklists every time. As it stands, the automatic release and advanced scheduling options are mutually exclusive and considered their own “template type” at creation. I would instead like the ability to select these as option on any template that I create in the future.
On behalf of a DEL (Daily Execution Lead) As a user, I would like the ability to rename my synthetic timeseries tags without InField creating a "new" synthetic tag and losing the linked historical data to the previous tag in the process
Submitted based on observations at Celanese of users having difficulty with keeping up with the tag naming convention. As an InField template builder, I want to be able to build InField manual tags without having to flip back and forth to my naming convention document to remind me how my organization is building manual tags. This would save time, improve consistency in naming tags, and allow the template builder to focus more on the build of the checklist rather than the naming. It would be nice for an organization to input a general template for a tag naming convention, and for InField to have this organized in a ready-to-use fashion so that the InField template builder only has to input the checklist item information.
On behalf of Celanese Units: Acid South, Vinyl Acetate, UtilitiesAs a process expert doing rounds on a mobile device it is not necessary to see the measurement reading time series tag associated to checklist item. It is confusing and takes up space on the mobile device. We can see/find it on trends when we are looking for it, if needed. Need a way to hide by default this when setting up a template or set to hide?
On behalf of Celanese Clear Lake Utilities InField Super UsersWould like to see Yes/No options included as status field in InField templates. This is especially important to the Utilities team as they implement their EHS check sheets which are regulated and routinely reviewed. The Ok/Not Ok fields do not satisfy this requirement. Example below:1.1 T0082 overhead pipe rack leaking? - (Yes/No)The above example can be confusing when restricted to (Ok/Not Ok) fields. Would “Ok” mean the there is a leak or the opposite? The Utilities team has expressed this concern primarily due to having to re-train the unit to understand the new nomenclature and would prefer to keep the (Yes/No) fields moving forward.
On behalf of Celanese Clear Lake Utilities and Loading/Shipping units InField Super Users As someone who creates templates, I need the the template to auto-save work every so often. If there is any disruption I lose all my work and it can be hours creating a template checklist for one routine round of many. When creating a template the <confirm> button is grayed out and no indication of why it will not save. If I cannot figure it out… then eventually have to leave the screen and lose all work. In order to avoid this for user friendly template creation - would like to see an alert indicating the issue/reason it will not all a save of the template. This will all me to go fix it and save my template without losing all the work. When creating a template and linking to an asset sometimes I am not able to link bc I don't know the exact asset ID in SAP. It would be a better experience to utilize the same search that the InField program has at top right (magnifying glass) to find an asset to hyperlink in template creation.
When ever i search and look around for anything with Fusion UI. i often have go alot of backwards and forwards, and it is not really a good experience. and it would be alot more efficient for me to be able to open resource types in another browser window. there are so many places where this would be very helpfull in the Fusion UI. examples are: finding files connected to an assett and wanting to look at them all one by one. you just want to open up a new tab in you browser for the files you want to look at. but you have to go so much back and forth with the current UI/UX in Fusion web UI. so whenever there is any CDF resourcce type in the Fusion UI I should be able to left click and “open in a new tab”. I’ve added to screenshots from the UI where I have leftclicked, and the “leftclick dropdown meny” does not show “open link in a new tab”. Hope this is an easy fix :)
As data manager I’d like to be able to monitor the usage of different data sets and even individual resources in CDF. This would provide valuable information on the importance of the different resources in CDF, and be useful in planning further development of our data products.One solution would be to include a counter on read operations per data set / resource.
As a user, I would like to store data in CDF with corresponding UOM so that I don't have to do conversions using transformations to store data in timeseries and then consume
I’m working on a use case for generating a list of infield tags, sorted by which ones have been outside of their range the most times in the past x amount of time. There are 2 key problems with implementing this use case:When a limit is updated in Infield, the metadata for the time series in CDF is updated, but records for any past limits, and the times that those limits were modified is not stored in CDF. So I will get false values for the number of times out of range if I’m looking at any time period where the ranges were different from what they currently are. The only way then is to check all past infield reports which is laborious and seems unnecessary. Text-based inputs lack any criterion indicating whether they are out of range in CDF. For some simple rounds where the in range value is “Normal” it is easy to get something working, but there are others that this doesn’t work for. Essentially despite numerical and text values being communicated to CDF, the in/out of range data represented by the green, yellow, and red tags are not communicated to CDF.
We used to have the precise number of resources on the tabs before but now if it's > 1000, i'll just display 1k+. The precise counts were very useful when testing and monitoring extraction or ingestion of data.
As a user I want to have the navigation improved (e.g. separate camera movement from view angel) so that it is easier to navigate around the 3D model As a user I want to have a possibility to navigate with keyboard only so that I can use a laptop without mouse As a user I want to be able to navigate in Remote with the touchpad so that I can use the application also on the go. As a user I want to be able to go with one click to an front/top/side view so that I can easily take measures and place markups in two dimensions
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
