Suggest features, upvote favorites, and use the user story format: > As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]. Help us build what you need - post your idea now!
What you should know submitting product ideas to our product team
Share your product ideas with the community and our product team
The statement problem is we have two SAP standard api, one is Material Document Header : /sap/opu/odata/sap/API_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_SRV/A_MaterialDocumentHeaderanother is Material document item: /sap/opu/odata/sap/API_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_SRV/A_MaterialDocumentItemBoth APIs share the common field "MaterialDocument."Since the Material document item API lacks date fields, to get delta records our approach is to retrieve the latest changed row from the header API, extract the materialDocument value, and then utilize this value in the item API to fetch the delta. We've implemented a custom SAP extractor with this logic.Please enhance the SAP extractor with nested queries
Users reported that not have the possibility to consider a Task as a required field, specially for numerical readings, will have a big impact in the operation. Operators can select the task's status even if they didn’t fill the numerical reading field.Having that possibility is important so the management team will have less work checking the checklists execution. We have examples where the Checklist has more than 100 tasks.
I am writing to request a new feature for the Cognite File Extractor tool that would enhance its functionality and usability. Specifically, I propose the addition of a configuration option to control the number of files loaded by the extractor.As a user of the Cognite File Extractor, I have encountered situations where I need to manage large volumes of files during extraction processes. Currently, the tool loads all files present in the specified directory, which can lead to performance issues and inefficiencies when dealing with a high number of files. Therefore, implementing a feature that allows users to specify the maximum number of files to be loaded in a controlled manner would greatly improve the tool's flexibility and performance.The proposed configuration option would enable users to define a limit on the number of files extracted, through a numerical input . This would give users greater control over the extraction process, allowing them to tailor it to their specific needs and optimize performance based on their system resources and workflow requirements.By introducing this configuration control, users can effectively manage resource utilization and streamline their extraction workflows, leading to improved efficiency and productivity. Also consider adding logging for this feature which will help to debug in case of issues.
Hi Team,Search functionality while exploring 3D Models not working as expected.Steps to Reproduce the issue.1. Navigate to data explorer.2. Click on 3D Tab.3. Select B60 (P-12) (32A-37-38A-38B) model.4. On the search box on the left select 07-C-0701A asset5. While the asset is selected on the right-hand side user will view all the assets, time series, file and events data.6. Click on assets tab. User will be able to view all the linked asset to the compressor 07-C-0701A as shown below. 7. Now on the left-hand side change the asset name from 07-C-0701A to 07-C-0701B as shown in image below.Expected Results As the user change the asset to 07-C-0701B on the left-hand side search window and click on the asset it directs the user to the correct object in 3D model and the list of assets on the right hand should also change. However, the list does not change as shown in the image above. As soon as the asset is changed on the search option on the left the direct linked asset shall also change.Observed Results Even though the asset on left hand side is changed the asset list on right hand side does not change automatically and use must close the asset window in right so that the linked asset related to 07-C-0701B are updated.
User cannot navigate back to present 360 image to previous 360 image.
On behalf of Celanese CDF super users:CDF currently limits PDF searching to 50 pages maximum. Scanned historical records are often 300+ Pages. The PDF's also load unacceptably slow. Users are forced to use source systems to access these files rather than CDF or Infield due to these limitations.
It would be nice if CDF offered an LLM which knows it’s eco system and can help build solutions. I tried to make one using CGPT-4 custom LLMs with the following prompt. However, it is prone to too much hallucination. Here is the prompt I used: This GPT understands fully the environment of CDF (Cognite Data Fusion). The GPT should be able to distinguish between all Cognite data structures (Time Series, Sequences, Events, Synthetic Time series, Assets, Data models etc. ) and how to work with them (CRUD, filter, aggregate..), understand the technologies available to use in CDF including their limitations on the platform (Streamlit, PowerBI etc.), understand Data Modelling in a CDF context (including CDF definitions for containers, spaces, direct relations, edges and views) and be well versed in the IO options to interact with CDF like the various toolkits and LATEST versions of SDKs (cognite-pygen, cognite-sdk, cognite-tk, cognite-logger, GraphQL etc.). The GPT should know everything that is published on [*.]cognite.com. (docs.cognite.com, learn.cognite.com, hub.cognite.com etc. and also cognite-sdk-python.readthedocs-hosted.com ). This includes all the case studies that can be found using Cognite. The GPT knows everything there is to know in the public domain about Cognite Data Fusion. It also knows pandas, numpy and plotly. The GPT assumes Python11 is used for code and can also code in PowerBI, GraphQL. The GPT can leverage cognite-tk and GitHub, GitHub Actions to give advice and code suited for DevOps for Cognite projects including managing staging and production environments. I don’t know if I missed any public source but even an LLM trained only on the sources I mentioned will be very useful.
Hi,I am using string Time Series to store machine state data (On/Off, Idle/Heating/Cooling) and want to be able to perform aggregations on these data via the API (specifically in Grafana). Obviously aggregations such as “sum” or “min/max” may not apply, but it would be great to perform aggregations for metrics like a count of how many times the machine entered each state over X time (e.g., cooling 5 times, heating 2 times), or what was the total time spent in each state over X time (e.g., cooling 3 hours, heating 5 minutes). There are probably other scenarios I haven’t described here as well.Thanks!
On behalf of a customer: After uploading a file in CDF there is a tedious process to be able to delete it again. Currently the step one needs to take to delete a file is through a transformation targeting that file. The ability to delete a file in the UI, with a confirmation message saying “do you want to delete this?” would make simple upload/deletion more seamless for an end user.
As a user, I desire the capability to save my plan analysis selections to a layout. This functionality would eliminate the need to recreate the plan analysis every time I access the plan. By having the ability to save and retrieve specific configurations, the process becomes more time-efficient and user-friendly, enhancing my overall experience with the plan analysis feature.
As a user, I find it confusing that the time selection above the Gantt chart functions as a filter rather than a zoom tool. I would like the time selector to be used for zooming on the Gantt chart, with the filter relocated to a more intuitive place.
As in industrial Oil & Gas environment some zones cannot be accessed by humans without a dedicated equipment, in case of incidents (such as a gas leak), it can be useful to have a robot able to intervene as the first support.So, to have that kind of feature, the robot needs to have an additional arm with a gripper that allows him to extract when necessary an human from a danger zone.In order to preserve the human from additional injuries while pulled out from the zone, the robot should have sensors and equipment able to have a first basic diagnosis (thermal camera, speakers, microphone) when crossing a person lying on the zone. Note that an operator can take the lead on the robot and uses it as a remote tool to avoid any risk on an autonomous computed decision from the robot which is not accurate with the incident environment.Note that the robot arm should stand to lift/drag the weight of a human body
As an industrial environment is not initially designed to let a robot to access to all areas, may be a solution to offer for robotics is to propose an hybrid approach combining a crawling/walking robot (main) with a flying drone.The crawling/walking robot will be used as a “base station” for the drone to charge, download data from a round, upload data to have a defined route or area to access.This also allows to restrict risks related to the management of common access (human and robots) on standard working areas, or areas out of main robot perimeter.By combining these two technologies, all areas from any industrial plant may be accessed. The only restrictions are on some specific areas (flare, chimney) where the drone needs to fly a bit away from the danger zone.
As a user, I want to view various work order attributes on the activity card beyond just the date and time. This is important because attributes other than date and time are often more relevant when I assess work orders.
DescriptionAuthors name should be removed from Authors filter option under Files Filter at Data Explorer screen.Steps to reproduce the issue: Login to CDF UI. Navigate to Data Explorer screen. Select the data sets as Data sets: src:006:documentum:b60:ds and Data sets: src:005:file-ep:b60:ds. check the Authors Filter select under Files Filter option. Expected results: User should not see any Authors name under Authors filter.Actual results: There are many authors names are displaying under Authors filter and need to know where these are coming from.
Description:Search results displays many fuzzy matches those not related to item which user try to retrieval.Steps to reproduce the issue: Login to CDF. Navigate to Data explorer screen. Click on Timeseries tab on the right side of the panel. Enter the search keyword FIT08006_D12.PV in search field. Expected results: The search results should display only data related to value/name in search field.Actual results: Search retrieves a very wide list of potential matches which not required, and it will confuse the users.
Hi there,are there any existing APIs available or any plan that can provide below information specific to timeseries/subscription for minimizing data retrieval overhead:list subscription details of single subscription to get list of external id of updated timeseries (if with metadata to avoid multiple API calls) from subscription (list members API provide all timeseries not only updated one) - (might be helpful to reduce response size excluding need to load all datapoints) In timeseries list API to get information if it is part of any subscriptionRegards
On behalf of Celanese users:Currently, once a numerical reading is created in Infield and the unit is set, there is no possibility for the user to change the unit, even if a mistake was made in the field configuration.Suggestion:Allow the unit to be edited until the checklists start being filled, this way, users will be able to edit the units as long as there is no data from that task.
In behalf of Celanese Bishop users:For numerical readings, we can set an acceptable range and if the operator informs a value that is outside of this range, Infield automatically sets the task status to “Not Ok”: However, the operator has the option to go to “Other” and set the status to “OK”, overriding the rule. For some of the readings, it might make sense to have this option, but for others the rule should not be overridden. We suggest this to be configurated on the template, so the operator can only override readings that are configured to have this option.We are planning to start the use of Infield in one of our units and this was pointed as a deal braker from the unit leadership.
Today, if an user add to a canvas a chart it is difficult to see that the different lines are related to. It would be beneficial to get a Legend similar how we have in charts to ensure that the user understand it what it mean: The reason behind the names are quite often cryptical and some more information would help the user.
This would be particularly helpful for visualizing a P&ID directly on the 3D model to see exactly where lines go, or what equipment is being mentioned in a particular procedure or company standard.
Use CaseAs a System Owner / Operations Manager / Facility Manager I want to manage how alerts are handled I need an ‘Alerts Management System’ similar to an ‘Alarm Management System’ in the process industries that allows; A central alert event register A standard message format for alerts Logic to identify first out alerts Prioritization of alerts Filtering of alerts based on user defined logic Masking of alerts (for equipment / systems not in service) Creation of rules for notification Channeling of notifications to Disciplines / Asset Owners / User Groups / Areas / Individuals within a group / ...
The same way as we have write protection on a dataset, I think it would be useful to be able to have read-protection, ie only read access on some resources on specific datasets for specific groupsAt the moment, if I want to restrict access to a specific dataset, I need to add all the others into the groups I want to scope access to. Similarly, we can give access to specific resources, but we cannot NOT give access to others, unless we want specifically add all the others into the access management. If we had at least this capability through datasets, it would help And being able to scope access on a root asset would also be helpful
Hi.Are there any plans for enabling on-the-fly adjustment of timestamps to local time? Some of our users of would prefer being able to consume the timeseries in local time rather than UTC. It would be nice to be able to leverage synthetic timeseries to get the timestamps in local time, and/or to be able to set the time zone for visualizations in Charts.
After contextualizing a batch of files using Interactive Engineering Diagrams (UI), the user is directed to a ‘Review results’ dashboard, but the unsorted list of files in the left-hand pane is not easy to navigate. A simple sorting function would help compared to the open search that is currently available. Additionally, once the user navigates away from the ‘Review results’ dashboard and then returns later, the dashboard is not available and the ‘Diagrams pending approval’ view is not nearly as user-friendly. There should be a way to step back into the ‘Review results’ dashboard. Additionally, when the model recognizes false positives on the files, it would save hours of time to be able to multi-select unwanted tags/annotations and reject them. Currently, we have to do this one by one and confirm we want to reject the tag each time which adds A LOT of clicks.
Check the
documentation
Ask the
Community
Take a look
at
Academy
Cognite
Status
Page
Contact
Cognite Support
