Impact 2024: The Industrial Data and AI Conference for and by Users | Nominate Speakers Now for a Ch...
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:I would like to see some functionality in InField that limits who can view and approve checklists based on discipline. An example of this is when a checklist has been opened from a maintenance work order. The process team captains should not be able to see these checklists in their “Checklists for approval” tab or even have the ability to approve any checklists that are owned by maintenance. Can the approval rights be restricted based on maintenance?
On behalf of Celanese Clear Lake InField super usres:When creating/editing a template in InField, I would like the ability to choose where my new line item is added in my checklist. This is especially important when editing existing templates that could have hundreds of line items. InField by default creates the new item at the bottom of the checklist and I would then have to click and drag the item where I would like it to be. This process is very time consuming and tedious. If instead, I am able to insert new items anywhere within my checklist it would save so much more time.
On behalf of Celanese CDF super users:CDF currently limits PDF searching to 50 pages maximum. Scanned historical records are often 300+ Pages. The PDF's also load unacceptably slow. Users are forced to use source systems to access these files rather than CDF or Infield due to these limitations.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:I would like the ability to archive and delete unwanted checklists in InField 2.0. Currently, InField 2.0 only supports the ability to delete templates but not checklists. The only option we are given is to mark checklists as “done”. However, if this is added, it must be limited by access permissions as we do not need all users to have the ability to delete checklists.
On behalf of Celanese Charts super users:As a user in Charts, when viewing “Public” charts, I would like to see some sort of folder categorization structure to improve navigation and searching. Currently, the public charts tab shows all charts that have been created. It is difficult to understand what could be relevant to my specific role without the additional context provided in the descriptions or opening each individual chart. It would be great to have the ability to group the charts by operating unit or even discipline. This will make it a bit easier to understand what is available.
On behalf of Celanese super users:I would like the ability to save layouts/templates for common filters that I use when searching for data in CDF. Currently, every time I use CDF, need to apply similar filters in order to focus my data search, such as dataset and/or additional metadata filters. If I was able to utilize user defined layouts this would make the user experience more streamlined and approachable.
On behalf of Celanese super users:We should have the ability to have multiple users edit inside a shared canvas. This would allow us to utilize canvas as a live workspace and is critical for any live troubleshooting or RCA working sessions. This should function similarly to a live document in SharePoint.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:I would like the ability to group and categorize my templates based on type. As we continue to digitize our checklists, the list of templates can become very long. This then leads to constant scrolling in InField to find the template that I need. Given that our checklists range from different types such as “Reading Sheets” or “EHSA Checklists”, it would be great if I could group these in a similar functionality that you see in the “Archived templates” tab (see below). This would make template navigation and management much easier.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:I would like the ability to visualize/trend the previous value that was captured in a checklist within the task without having to use Charts/trend overview page. This will allow me to have visibility on downward trending items while executing a checklist and provide insight to items that may require escalation.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:Currently, InField only supports an itemized list view when creating templates. However, for Maintenance applications, I would like to see some flexibility in template formatting to allow support for tables (multiple columns and rows) similar to original Excel forms today. Given that maintenance checklists cover multiple inspection criteria per equipment, a list is not the ideal interface as the users would be required to scroll through a long list of items.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:When building templates in InField 2.0, it has been discovered that there is currently a limit of 500 tasks that can be added to a template. Can this be increased? There are a few checklists in the unit where this limit is easily reached. The only workaround today is to separate the checklists into parts, which is not ideal.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:When executing a checklist in offline mode on a mobile device; it has been discovered that there is a risk of losing data due to accidentally refreshing the screen. Due to the design of the UI of InField 2.0, it is common to frequently scroll through a checklist when completing. Most users do this rather quickly without giving it much thought. However, when scrolling back to the top of a checklist, a user could be at risk of accidentally refreshing the screen whenever they reach the boundary limit (very top item) of a checklist. This is due to how the touch interface works on the mobile devices. To refresh the browser, the user needs to only press and drag their finger down on the screen window to initiate a refresh. This is a common movement when scrolling through checklists and could be inadvertently initiated. Would it be possible to include visual indicators or engineers controls that could limit the possibility of this issue occurring? Per
On behalf of Celanese InField super users: I would like to see improved functionality for adding line items to an existing group or merging groups. Currently, I am unable to drag and drop a new item into an existing group. Instead I am required to select the item I want to add and an item within an existing group and merge the groups as a “new” group. However, when this is done, the new group is moved to the bottom of the checklist. It would be a smoother user experience to be able to add an item to a group directly and without the position of the group being moved.@Kristoffer Knudsen
On behalf of Celanese Clear Lake InField super users:As a user, when creating a template in InField, I would like the ability to choose from a standardized list of units (UOM). This will help standardize template creation across the site and avoid confusion due to discrepancies related to variation and syntax errors. An example of this can be seen below:PSI > psi > psig or GPM > gpm > gal/min
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:As a user, when marking a section of line items as “N/A”, I would like the completion status to show that the section was marked as “N/A” and highlighted as yellow. Instead, InField currently shows the status as “Done” and highlights the section in green. This gives the impression that the tasks were completed, which is not the case.
On behalf of Celanese super users:I would like the ability to highlight and showcase only the most current and live value from a time series tag on my canvas. This would be similar functionality to what is possible via Pi process books or PowerBi dashboards. Currently, canvas only allows you to visualize the full trend of a time series tag at different time intervals. It would be great to have the option to swap between a single data point and the trend.
On behalf of Celanese Charts super users:I would like to see a mobile view mode for Charts. When trying to pull up Charts calculations in the field using a mobile device, the user experience is not the best. It would be great if CDF/Charts had a dedicated mobile view similar to InField so that users can pull up their Charts calculations out in the field.
On behalf of Celanese InField 2.0 super users:Can the threshold for triggering offline mode be adjusted? Based on this Cognite Hub posting, it is understood that offline mode is only triggered when there is a complete loss of connection. Currently, users are experiencing issues with offline mode triggering during instances of slow/poor connectivity. We are noticing with the Zebra devices specifically, that they tend to hold on to a connection signal for as long as they can regardless of the strength of the signal. This is causing instances where the connection becomes so poor that the users are unable to capture their data and, in some cases, lose their data during a signal transition phase by which the devices switch to a stronger signal connection. The devices are never truly in a “no connectivity” state and therefore Infield never initiates offline mode.This is currently a high priority issue and is causing two units at the site to consider forcing the devices into airplane mode and
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:As a user, I would like the ability to view Charts within InField. Currently, InField allows me to view trends that are linked to an asset. I would like to see this functionality expand to Charts trends & calculations that are linked to an asset via time series. The only way to view created Charts is through the desktop interface and requires users to walk back to their computers. Having the ability to access Charts via mobile devices in InField would help with troubleshooting out in the field.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:I would like to see more accessibility options for InField. An example would be the ability to alter the color spectrum of contextualized links on smart P&IDs for users that are color blind. Additionally, having a legend on what each color represents in terms of contextualization would further improve the user experience.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users: The users have expressed interests in being able to see both observations and any comments/notes that have been linked to an asset on the asset overview page. This would make the data easily accessible rather than needing to open specific checklists. @Kristoffer Knudsen
On behalf of Celanese Clear Lake InField super users:When creating a template in InField, I would like the ability to create branches of logic for specific checklists items such as an “IF” statement. This feature would allow me to have certain line items appear only if a specific response is provided. In InField’s current state, I can only provide “N/A” as a response for items that do not apply given the current state. This can make the checklists longer than they may need to be. An example of this can be as below:Is pump seal leaking? (If yes, please complete the following.) Leak report filed? Time detected? Time corrected?
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:As a user, when creating a template/checklist in InField, I would like the ability to create more than two-levels of sections. This will allow me to effectively organize and structure my templates/checklists in more detail where needed. Given that most current checklists are being transferred from a table/matrix with multiple columns to a list of items within InField, the added layer sectioning will allow me to group line items based on what is required rather than having to provide all information required on a single line item. An example of this can be a checklist for a unit that is built as:Area > Sub Area/System > Equipment > Task
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:I would like the ability to access other checklists when in offline mode. Currently, offline mode restricts you to the checklist that you have open in that point in time. The reason this would be needed, is that some users execute checklists based on where they are in the unit. This sometimes will involve jumping between different checklists to complete items.
On behalf of Celanese InField super users:As a user, when using the advanced scheduling option, I would like the ability to archive/close specific shifts when completed within the week without having to wait for the complete week to be finished. This will allow for streamlined reporting on a day/shift basis withing a week schedule.This feature is also important in preventing data integrity issues. As it stands, a user can go to a previous days reading within the week and change it given that the checklist remains open for the entire week.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.