Skip to main content
New

Native NumericSeries/DepthSeries for oil & gas data

Related products:REST APIData Modeling
  • January 22, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 156 views

Pavel Gutarov
Practitioner ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Forum|alt.badge.img+14

Summary

Introduce a first-class NumericSeries object in Cognite CDF to natively represent depth-indexed data (measured depth, true vertical depth) and elapsed-time-indexed measurements (wireline elapsed time, drilling offsets in hours). Depth is a fundamental axis in upstream oil & gas, on par with time measurements. A NumericSeries would unlock more natural storage, querying, visualization, and analytics for a large portion of subsurface and drilling data.

Why numeric indexes matter in Upstream Oil & Gas

Numeric indexes are the most widely used independent variables across the upstream domain:

  • Drilling: MWD/LWD logs, drilling parameters vs. depth, trajectories, broomsticks, hole conditions

  • Geology: lithology descriptions, stratigraphic tops, formations, facies vs. depth

  • Petrophysics: wireline logs, core measurements, interpreted curves

  • Reservoir & Completions: perforations, zones, intervals, properties vs. depth

  • Elapsed time s/min/hr in addition to depth: wireline, well testing, drilling offsets

Statistically, the largest share of subsurface data in upstream O&G is indexed by depth rather than time. Treating depth as a first-class concept would better reflect how domain experts think, work, and analyze data. Traditionally storage and infrastructure around depth and time logs in upstream software follows exactly the same pattern (everything except the index type).

Options

In 2026 CDF currently has 3 potential options to store depth data - Sequences, Records, Files. Theoretically, CDF also allows to use TimeSeries, since index is integer. Integer index is interpreted as milli-seconds since 1970, however can hold any value, for example, millimeters, which is OK for depth and length measurements. One of viable options for future CDF is to fork TimeSeries into NumericSeries (or DepthSeries, or LengthSeries), since it seems to satisfy most of requirements for this kind of object

Feature comparison

 

Requirement for numeric

Sequences

Records

Files

NumericSeries*

Static schema (ex, trajectory)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Flexible schema (most depth)

Static only

Static only

Any

Any

Datasets 1000+ columns

200 max

1000 max

Any

Any

Datasets 100k+ rows

Too heavy

All data <50M

Any

Any

RAW and Transformations

Yes

No

No

Any

Filtering by index

Only int index

Yes

No

Any

Filtering by column values

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Aggregations

No

Yes

No

Yes

Chunking/pagination

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Unit conversions

No

No, planned

No

Yes

Python SDK

Yes, now

No, planned

Yes

Yes

Extractor support

Yes

Yes, partial

Yes

Yes

Value type - float

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Value type - float[], images

No

Via JSON

Yes

No

Value type - text

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Value type - timestamp

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Available in CDF UI

Yes, native

Custom app

Yes

Custom app

 

Value to CDF and Users

  • Aligns CDF’s data model with upstream O&G data models (OSDU, WITSML, PPDM)

  • Improves performance and usability for subsurface and drilling workflows

  • Enables rich domain-specific applications and analytics

  • Lowers total cost of ownership by simplifying data pipelines

  • Strengthens CDF as a system of record for subsurface and drilling data

1 reply

  • Practitioner ⭐️⭐️⭐️
  • February 14, 2026

Hello, we’ve receive your request and are evaluating it with the product team.