Skip to main content
Gathering Interest

Infield checklists - Operating in spare equipment

Related products:InField
Anita Hæhre
ane.eide
joar.saether
+13
  • Anita Hæhre
    Anita Hæhre
  • ane.eide
    ane.eide
  • joar.saether
    joar.saether
  • Stig Grafsrønningen
  • Pedersen Jon-Robert
  • ishita1983
    ishita1983
  • alfi
  • Kristian Nymoen
  • Thomas Røkke
  • Patrick Galler
  • Raluca Bala
  • Abram Ziegelaar
    Abram Ziegelaar
  • Lars Lie
  • Ole Thoresen
  • JON L
  • Giovanna Luna Rosseto
  • Andrew Wagner
    Andrew Wagner
  • KHAN MUDASSIR

dalvaniamp
Seasoned

On behalf of Celanese Bishop users:

In some units, we have several equipment that operate in spare: while one is working, the other is stopped and periodically they switch. Roughly, half of the equipment in each unit operate in this condition.

 

During the rounds, the operators have to take readings from the equipment that is working at that time.

 

What we have done so far in Infield is creating tasks for both of them, but this leads to around a quarter of the readings to be set as “Not applicable” or to be left empty. Both options are far from ideal: while the first could detract from the user experience and potentially introduce additional barriers to adoption, the latter creates confusion when delving into the details within the summary dashboards (in the lines of “were these tasks left empty intentionally or they are just missing?”).

 

Therefore, we request an improved way of configuring these checklists, so the operator can just set which equipment is operating and the readings will be taken only for this equipment. The spare one, ideally, would not have any readings to take.

4 replies

Everton Colling
Seasoned Practitioner
Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi @dalvaniamp!


Thank you for suggesting this product idea. We will follow the traction this idea gets in the community. You can expect updates on this post if we decide to include this in our future roadmap, or if we require more information.


  • Practitioner
  • 3 replies
  • November 18, 2024

Hi Dalvania!

 

Thank you again for this suggestion. We are planning to develop something called a “Smart Checklist” which would provide conditional capabilities depending on if/what inputs from Operators. Would I be correct in assuming that if Pump A is not running, then Pump B should be a selectable asset in the task? If Pump B is then selected, then those measurements should instead be contextualized to Pump B?


dalvaniamp
Seasoned
Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Author
  • Seasoned
  • 16 replies
  • November 18, 2024

Hi Elise!

 

Thank you for your response. Yes, your assumption is correct. If Pump A is not running, then Pump B should be a selectable asset in the task, and the measurements should be contextualized to Pump B. There are some circumstances where both pumps are running, most of the time they work as you mentioned.


Hi Elise, this is also a discussion that was raised in Clear Lake and there is some interest related to that.


Reply


Cookie Policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie Settings