I would like to please match the cognite tabs here to the right SAP fields. Can we include more tabs such as components, objects, cost, operations? We have the data coming but it needs to be organized in the black rectange.
so in SAP, we have the following headers
so Objects is where - we should have object list as below (not components which we are showing?)
Next question: How do we tie a checklist to the work order? should that be on operations tab or should that be on Objects? Food for thought
how do i automatically assign a checklist to the work order? can contextualization do that?
Hi Ibrahim, I think we should set up a session together with our designer so that we can understand the use case better. I’ll send you an invite!
Hi@Jonas Laberg , happy to discuss on a call. Can we setup something in the next few days?
An update for the benefit of any followers:
Ibrahim, myself and a number of other participants discussed this feature. We agreed there is a need and will put the request in the backlog. A caveat: this issue will be subject to future analysis and the solution might take a different form than what is shown here. What we aim to do is solve for the underlying user need.
Hi@ibrahim.alsyed - thanks for reaching out!
Similar to the “lab and incident data” use case we also want to provide more flexibility in the amount of data that is shown from each source system, such as more fields (tabs) from SAP. This feature has the same underlying InField technical dependencies as the “lab and incident data”, so this is also currently planned for Q2.
Thanks!
Hi@Kristoffer Knudsen or @Anita Hæhre where does this feature stand?
Kristoffer forgot about it
Hi@Marcela Young @ibrahim.alsyed ,
Thanks for the reminder. We were not able to prioritise this one last year, but it’s still our ambition to offer this flexibility in surfacing data relevant in the field. There is a wider product collaboration on this topic now, and I will come back to you once there is a concrete timeline.
Thanks!
We have discussed internally with Ram and agree this is a high priority for Celanese.