Impact 2024: The Industrial Data and AI Conference for and by Users | Nominate Speakers Now for a Ch...
Hi Felipe!Thank you for suggesting this product idea. We will follow the traction this idea gets in the community. You can expect updates on this post if we decide to include this in our future roadmap, or if we require more information.- Marius
Hi Bruno!Thank you for suggesting this product idea. We will follow the traction this idea gets in the community. You can expect updates on this post if we decide to include this in our future roadmap, or if we require more information.- Marius
Hi @Anwar Bernal!Thank you for suggesting this product idea. We will follow the traction this idea gets in the community. You can expect updates on this post if we decide to include this in our future roadmap, or if we require more information.- Marius
Hi, Martin This is possible for sure. Let’s prioritise the next features for in the upcoming hub session! cc @Kristin Hærnes Ihlen
Updated idea statusPlanned for development→Gathering Interest
Gathering Interest→Planned for development
Hello! Thanks for posting here. Have heard this a few times and it is something we want to enable.There are some tradeoffs between the current approach and the one which would give you what you are looking for.Suggest we have a discussion on this in an upcoming design session.cc @Kristin Hærnes Ihlen
Thanks for posting here @Lukas Volker, we will look into it.
New→Planned for development
New→Gathering Interest
Question: As this could potentially hit some API limitations. Could a feasible usage pattern here be to narrow down the count to below a 1000 before applying select all?
Planned for development→Implemented
Hello @Christoph! Apologies for the late reply. We support similar type of querying today, and are also looking at improvements in this area specifically related to isolation plans as input to the box selection.As an example of what you can do today:- Group and/or filter down to an area (which has a multiple FLOCs connected to it) and view all work orders and associated FLOCs to this area.Here exemplified below using FLOCs grouping as we don’t have areas in the demo tenant. While we do not support filtering by isolation plans yet, you could visually identify other work through viewing the isolation plan with work orders overlayed as here below to identify grouping opportunities. Similarly you could also today bring in plotplans with area markings to do a similar grouping exercise. In the future we want to be able to identify work orders based on FLOCs related to an isolation plan more easily. Thanks for reaching out and let me know if you have more input and thoughts from your particul
Hi @Marcela Young and @Kylie R!One thing we can do today is brining in active isolations (if we have that data somewhere e.g. in the permit to work system) into 3D as overlays i.e. so if there is an active isolation connected to an equipment we can highlight the equipment in a colour in 3D. Would this be relevant? Keen to hear more about the case and what you are thinking.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.