Impact 2024: The Industrial Data and AI Conference for and by Users | Nominate Speakers Now for a Ch...
@Kristoffer Knudsen Can you please update on when we can expect this functionality, Thanks
@Elka Sierra @Hunter Beck Can we get a timeline on when to expect this feature implemented. This is a blocker for CDF adoption in a number of places where we have documents greater than 50 pages, Thanks
@Kristoffer Knudsen Yes only the template/checklist admins should be the only ones who should be able to delete them.
@Bruno Muniz Nicacio Can you please provide more context and additional reasoning behind the ask for this feature request, Thanks
@Hunter Beck @Jørgen Lund Can we get some clarity on the timeline, for when we can expect this incorporated? Thanks
We have discussed this internally and agreed that this item is a Blocker for Celanese user adoption.
We have discussed this internally and agreed that this of High Priority to Celanese.
We have discussed this internally and agreed that this is of High Priority to Celanese.
Hi @Sofie Svartdal Berge Thank you for the update. Do you have a tentative timeline for when we can expect this feature? It has been a long standing request from us and definitely a HIGH priority item for CDF adoption.
@Benjamin A Onweni can you provide additional details on the driver for this request? Thanks
@Anita Hæhre Can you please tag Celanese on this request. Thanks
@Anita Hæhre can you please add Celanese tag to this item, Thanks
Hi, I am not sure if Planned for development is the most appropriate status for things that are in the backlog? We currently don’t review the “Planned for development” items with Cognite product teams, I feel there is a chance something important in backlog - can lose track if tagged as “Planned for development”, without a defined timeline for implementation.
It sure helped our end users at WW, Thanks Kristoffer!
@Anita Hæhre Please tag this product idea to celanese, Thanks
@Anita Hæhre please tag this to celanese, Thanks
@Anita Hæhre please tag this product idea to celanese, Thanks
@crgomez13 Media file upload is now optional in our project. The ability to send an observation without a media file has been recently enabled.
@Arun Arunachalam Can we please ensure the specific users building the monitoring or charts calculations decide on what to do with missing data, bad data or un-certain data. When a timeseries is brought in to the chart/calculation, it would greatly help having this ability at the input level (for each of the inputs going into a calculation separately). Thanks
@Hunter Beck we need this item priority escalated on Cognite end and incorporation of this into roadmap and timeline for implementation on this functionality, as this limitation has come across several times over the past year. If you would like us to setup a call to discuss the details, I would be glad to setup a call with our Ingestion team members. Thanks
This functionality need to be restricted to a chosen/select set of users who are to be part of a separate CDF access group.
That should definitely work as a starting point, will circle back with the user who brought forward this request. Thanks for the guidance!
Sure, Please schedule this and include @ibrahim.alsyed and @Robert from Celanese as well, along with me.
Read only sharing for review purposes will be a good starting point, Ability to work collaboratively in building and updating charts with a small group of selected collaborators by owner, has definite advantages while building complex use cases for charts.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.