Impact 2024: The Industrial Data and AI Conference for and by Users | Nominate Speakers Now for a Ch...
Thanks @Crystal Connor Richards ! ToDo = Checklist in this context I presume? So, if I understand correctly, when completing items in a checklist the user would like the ability to write-back a string to CDF capturing the information on what was done on the particular checklist item? Also, do you have any insights on what the user needs to further report on? Br,Kristoffer
Thanks for the input @Crystal Connor Richards! Will investigate this with the team.
Thanks @ibrahim.alsyed ! Adding more flexibility to the Checklists is something we want to do. Q: Could the Checklists potentially be optimised and ordered prior to starting the round? If so, I’m assuming there won’t be a need for re-ordering the checklists during the round? Let me know if that’s wrong. Also, how would they figure out what items that are physically near each other, e.g. do they already know this based on the tag/assets, do they need to use 3D, etc.?
Thanks @ibrahim.alsyed !Very interesting. Measurements reading is something our Robotics team have a lot of experience with and as mentioned in Oslo we defiantly want to tie this better together with InField, and I think this could be an interesting place to start. (cc @Elias Bjørne)
Thanks @ibrahim.alsyed ! I’m unsure if we’ve encountered this type of user need before, but will look into it. Will also be interesting to see if there’s more of these “types” of visual needs when meeting the operators in person next week. (cc @Nicklas Lind)
Thanks @ibrahim.alsyed ! Who is “management” in this context? Immediately I would assume that either “management” or the data itself should decide if an equipment is down and thereby N/A, and not the operator themselves. On the latter, do you know if there’s a Time Series indicating if it’s running or not in your Historian/PI (something like 1-running, 0-not running)?
👍 I assume these are related @ibrahim.alsyed ?
Thanks @Crystal Connor Richards !“Too many come up..” - do you mean that too many Time Series are shown when navigating to a specific asset/tag? The asset page in InField display the Time Series linked to the specific asset/tag in the data model, so it shouldn’t be “random”. In general, how our users work with trends from Time Series is something we defiantly want to investigate going forward (e.g. setting “my favourite trends”). We are not aiming to inventing another Charting/Trending tool, so the current plan is to integrate with Cognite Charts in the future.
Thanks! @Crystal Connor Richards- I read this one as a bit different, but quite similar, feature need as this one: Is that correct?
@ibrahim.alsyed Yes, you can expect this during Q4 👍 Currently investigating how to solve it optimally
Interesting! (cc @Nicklas Lind ) So instead of being limited to a list like this when creating a new Template: Section 1 item 1 item 2 ... Section 2 ...You are thinking about something like this instead: Section 1 Type 1 ... item 1 item 2 ... …. Section 2 Correct?
Hi @Hud - thanks for posting! Just to ensure I understand you. An operator is out in the field to capture the latest readings, and when on a specific asset/equipment they would like a quick way of seeing the previous reading as well, to be able to determine if it’s increasing/decreasing?How it’s set up today: if the manual reading is connected to an asset/equipment, they should be able to find the trend of this reading (the history) on the asset page. Does that work? or am I misunderstanding? Looking forward to seeing you and discussing in person next week!
Hi @Culbreth Dylan Celanese - thanks for the reaching out with feedback on Hub! This makes a lot of sense, and resonates well with what we discussed with Hud around scheduling flexibilities. Will take it back to the team (cc @Nicklas Lind). Also, great meeting you this week.
Hi @Audun Systad, thanks for reaching out! Yes, we are aware of the struggles with the current log-in flow and defiantly something we are looking to resolve. Currently, we have some external dependencies to make this happen, but will keep you updated. Thanks!
Thanks @Hud ! This resonates well with the usability in navigating checklists that we discussed this week, we’ll bring it back to the team. Great meeting you this week btw.
Hi @Audun Systad - thanks for reaching out. This is linked to this request:
Hi @rmaidla - thanks for reaching out! If you create a measurement reading and in the “Add new template item” box enter a tag that’s already in Cognite Data Fusion the values you then enter are automatically contextualised to that tagged asset. As you can see in the attached screenshot “21PT1019” is blue, which means that it is contextualised to an asset, while “time series” is grey since there is no tag with the name “time series” in Cognite Data Fusion.Based on my example below, do I understand correctly that you now want to add sub-tasks beneath that “21PT1019” item that are measurement readings (temp, pressure, etc.) which are then directly linked to the tag “21PT1019”?
Thanks @Culbreth Dylan Celanese! Aware of that this is important for the VAM unit, and will look into it.
Thanks @Crystal Connor Richards! We’re aware of the underlying issues Loading/Shipping is facing resulting in the feature requests in 1) and 2) and looking into it. Point 3) is really interesting as well and resonates with feedback we’ve had before. Adding it to the backlog. Thanks!
Thanks @Benjamin A Onweni! As a Team Captain, DEL or Supervisor in general, responsible for reviewing and approving a checklist, receiving a notifications makes a lot of sense. We’ll bring it to the team and evaluate when we can look into what to do here.
Thanks for posting! We discussed this one in our Celanese meeting on Tuesday, and I believe we understand the need and we want to support this. As mentioned on Tuesday, we currently don’t have this on our roadmap for Q4, but we’ll do an assessment and see when this can be included. Thanks again!
Hi Irie, thanks for reaching out! We’ll bring this need into the backlog and evaluate it.I wonder, is it possible for you to send me a picture per email of one of these manuals you use today? Would be very relevant for understanding how we might meet this need.Br,Kristoffer
Hi, sorry for the late reply. Yes, this is how it is designed. This feature was developed quite some time ago, and at that time we were unsure if checking a custom state should actually mean that something was “done” and thereby count as a “task completed” out-of-the-box. One way this was used was as underlying steps to complete some job, e.g. step 1, step 2 and finally”ok”. However, this logic can be discussed. Do they have a particular use case in mind? Br,Kristoffer
Hi! Please see our latest release notes: https://docs.cognite.com/infield/changelogIn our last release we added a label to the checklist sections, which shows the remaining tasks in that section and gives an indication of the status (e.g. if readings are out of range). Seeing images and comments on checklist sections is not part of this initial release, but something we’ll bring in later. Please start testing it and provide us with feedback 😀
Hi @Culbreth Dylan Celanese , please see our latest release notes! You now have the possibility to toggle between creating checklists with the Open checklist button and selecting Automatically open daily checklist for selected disciplines. Remember to toggle the Automatically open daily checklist for selected disciplines back on again once you are ready to continue opening them automatically. Please test it out and provide us with feedback!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.